On Friday, July 5, 2013, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On 7/3/13 7:15 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > I'm not comfortable with having all of the transform mappings in the
> > main contrib/ directory though.  Can we add a subdirectory called
> > "transforms" containing all of these?
>
> I don't see any value in that.  The data types they apply to are in
> contrib after all.
>
>
I guess his suggestion is contrib/transforms directory, not transforms
directory at top level.  Stil you don't see value?




-- 
Hitoshi Harada

Reply via email to