On 7/4/13 10:11 PM, Arulappan, Arul Shaji wrote: > The main aim at the moment is to get some feedback on the above to know > if this feature is something that would benefit PostgreSQL in general, > and if users maintaining DBs in non-English speaking regions will find > this beneficial.
For European languages, I think everyone has moved to using Unicode, so the demand for supporting multiple encodings is approaching zero. The CJK realm might have difference requirements. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
