Peter Geoghegan escribió: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > > I see this patch is still "waiting on author" in the CF. Is there > > something else needed from me, or should we move this to "ready for > > committer"? > > Well, obviously someone still needs to think through the handling of > the infoMask bits.
Well, Tom opined in http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/23249.1370878...@sss.pgh.pa.us that the current patch is okay. I have a mild opinion that it should instead print only SHR_LOCK when both bits are set, and one of the others when only one of them is set. But I don't have a strong opinion about this, and since Tom disagrees with me, feel free to exercise your own (Jeff's) judgement. Tom's the only available committer in this case anyway. [Actually, pgfoundry.org says it's a zero-people team in the pgfiledump project right now, but I'm hoping that's just a temporary glitch.] -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
