On 2013/07/09, at 4:09, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 07/05/2013 10:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Yeah, it would be good to revive this thread now, which is the >> beginning of the development cycle. As of now, just to recall >> everybody, an agreement on this patch still needs to be found... Simon >> is concerned with backward compatibility. Greg presented a nice spec >> some time ago (Robert and I liked it) which would break backward >> compatibility but allow to begin with a fresh infrastructure. > > As folks know, I favor Smith's approach. However, as far as I can find, > GSmith never posted a patch for his version. Actually I did. http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqR+fpopEDMoecK+AfZB5a8kUUvxpU=1a2JiX5d9s=0...@mail.gmail.com -- Michael (Sent from my mobile phone)
