> Hello Tatsuo,
>
>> I have looked into this:
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1105
>> because it's marked as "Ready for committer". However I noticed that
>> you worried about other pgbench patches such as
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1103 .
>>
>>> So I would like to know whether the throttling patch is committed and
>>> then update the progress patch to take that into account.
>>
>> Shall I wait for your pgbench --throttle patch becomes ready for
>> committer?
>
> No. I'll submit another patch to the next commitfest to improve the
> progress behavior under throttling, if & when both initial patches are
> committed.
Ok, so I looked into the progress patch. One thing I noticed was:
case 'P':
progress = atoi(optarg);
if (progress <= 0)
{
fprintf(stderr,
"thread progress delay (-P) must not
be negative (%s)\n",
optarg);
exit(1);
}
break;
For me, the error message is not quite right, because progress == 0
case is considered error as well in your patch. I sugges you change
the error message something like:
"thread progress delay (-P) must be positive number (%s)\n",
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
