Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
> On 07/09/2013 01:10 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> Where are we with this patch? Fabien, are you going to submit an
>>> updated version which addresses the objections, or should I mark it
>>> Returned With Feedback?
>> There is no need for an updated patch. I addressed the objections with
>> words, not code:-)
> So, Tom, Robert, Cedric: can we have a verdict? Commit or no?
My vote is still no, because of (1) the keyword-creep issue, and
(2) the fact that this is proposing to invent non-standard syntax
for functionality that's in the SQL standard.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
