Peter Eisentraut wrote: > In general, I find these new wordings to be a loss of clarity. There is > no indication on the SELECT man page or in the documentation index what > a "row-level lock" is at all. > > I would suggest that these changes be undone, except that the old > "SELECT FOR ..." be replaced by a dynamic string that reverse-parses the > LockingClause to provide the actual clause that was used.
Hmm, that's an idea. If there are no objections, I'll get this fixed. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
