Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> if (lockmode == AccessShareLock)
> aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> ACL_SELECT);
> + else if (lockmode == RowExclusiveLock)
> + aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> + ACL_INSERT | ACL_UPDATE | ACL_DELETE | ACL_TRUNCATE);
> else
> aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> ACL_UPDATE | ACL_DELETE | ACL_TRUNCATE);
Perhaps it would be better to refactor with a local variable for the
aclmask and just one instance of the pg_class_aclcheck call. Also, I'm
pretty sure that the documentation work needed is more extensive
than the actual patch ;-). Otherwise, I don't see a problem with this.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
