2013/7/23 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> writes: >> Is looking for the biggest tables a common enough thing that it should >> be available to everyone, without needing custom customization? > > I don't really think so. It's surely not much harder than > > select relname, pg_relation_size(oid) from pg_class order by 2 desc; > > Moreover, the people who need this likely don't need it as a psql > command, but rather as something available to monitoring tools.
I can do it - but it is not consistent with other psql commands - so why we have \dt statement ? and this was is not simple for people that are on basic level. My motivations for this proposal are: * comfortable usage of psql * consistency with current psql design (I don't expect major reimplementation and redesign in next 5 years) and its completation * very simply implementation we use a splunk, but when you have opened psql console, is not comfortable to swith to splunk. > > regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
