Andres Freund wrote: > On 2013-07-24 11:53:39 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Andres Freund wrote:
> > Amusingly, this will mean ForgetBackgroundWorker() will need to have a > > slist_mutable_iter * argument if it wants to use the new function ... > > The only alternative I see would be to pass both the prev, and the cur > elements which seems to be less expressive from my POV. > I am open to other suggestions? In the grand scheme of things, I think it's fine. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
