Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > By reading this thread, -1 for the addition of a new GUC parameter related > to cascading, it looks like an overkill for the possible gain. And +1 for > the removal of WAL file once it is replayed in archive recovery if > cascading replication is not allowed. However, what about
Well, we still don't register standby servers, so I vote against early removal of files that you have no possible way to know if they are still useful or not. We need something smarter here. Please. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
