On 08/06/2013 08:26 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > Here are the latest pgbench results from the IBM POWER7 machine. > These results were gathered about two weeks ago. I ran each test > configuration three times; below I report the median of the three > results. For all runs, I used scale factor = 300, clients = jobs, and > the following non-default configuration parameters: shared_buffers = > 8GB, maintenance_work_mem = 4GB, synchronous_commit = off, > checkpoint_segments = 300, checkpoint_timeout = 15min, > checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9, log_line_prefix = '%t [%p] '. > Commits in use were cce5d681be7abfd9f48c28151ebf2b242f8ba438, > dd8ea2eb5e996f3f3dfd928e20aa2462c4bd9c63, > cce5d681be7abfd9f48c28151ebf2b242f8ba438.
What's the length of the run each time? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
