Bruce, > You are getting into some kind of loop where not wanting to expend > unlimited effort on something means, to you, that the person doesn't > think the goal is important. Effort has to be balanced. This is not > the first time I have seen such loops. And why do you even care about > my opinion?
Aha, OK. So you're talking about all the different things we might do to get more reviewers. I'm only talking about adding reviewers to the bottom of the release notes, which is certainly a bounded activity of *very* limited effort. Which is why I was confused and aghast at your talk of "unbounded work". To be completely clear: I am talking only about the compromise discussed on this thread, namely: a) listing reviewers who did "extensive work" as co-authors on the patch, and b) listing other reviewers at the bottom of the release notes. Per earlier discussions. You started this thread by claiming that adding the reviewers to 9.4 would be too hard, and I argued that it would not and in fact I'm already working on it. Nothing I've talked about in this thread has been about anything else. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
