On 2013-08-08 12:50:31 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 01:27:35PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > Why are we suddenly trying to make this even more complicated? It's too > > > late to redesign stuff without very good evidence that it's > > > needed. Renaming trigger files and changing their format certainly > > > doesn't seem appropriate post-beta. > > > > > > Let's just leave this as is, and remove the code in 9.4/9.5. > > Sorry. I should have been clearer. I meant that for 9.4~ only. For 9.3 > > yes it's too late. > > We seem to be all over the map with the fast promotion code --- some > people don't trust it, some people want an option to enable the old > method, and some people want the old method removed. > > This has left us in an odd situation where we are going to ship 9.3 > old-method code with no way to enable it in case we need it.
That's not true. It's relatively easy to trigger it. You just can't use pg_ctl. Which seems completely fine for debugging. Imo there's no need to do anything. Which is what we've concluded on before... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers