Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:53:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This really requires more than no attention to the comments, especially
>> since you just removed the only apparent reason for _getObjectDescription
>> to make a distinction between objects whose name includes a schema and
>> those that don't.
> I am confused. Are you saying I didn't read the comments, or that I can
> now merge the schema-qualified and non-schema-qualified object sections?
Well, it's certainly not immediately obvious why we shouldn't merge them.
But I would have expected the function's header comment to now explain
that the output is intentionally not schema-qualified and assumes that the
search path is set for the object's schema if any.
> Also, this seems like dead code as there is no test for "INDEX" in the
> if() block it exists in:
> /*
> * Pre-7.3 pg_dump would sometimes (not always) put a fmtId'd name
> * into te->tag for an index. This check is heuristic, so make its
> * scope as narrow as possible.
> */
> if (AH->version < K_VERS_1_7 &&
> te->tag[0] == '"' &&
> te->tag[strlen(te->tag) - 1] == '"' &&
> strcmp(type, "INDEX") == 0)
> appendPQExpBuffer(buf, "%s", te->tag);
> else
Huh, yeah it is dead code, since _printTocEntry doesn't call this function
for "INDEX" objects. And anyway I doubt anybody still cares about reading
7.2-era archive files. No objection to removing that.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
