On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 02:18:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > No, wait, I take that back. I was thinking that the function call would > dump out as trim(x, y) but actually none of the underlying functions > are named just "trim"; they're btrim, ltrim, or rtrim. So actually the > dump/reload scenario does not have anything to do with the trim_list > production --- the underlying functions just parse normally in any case.
Right, TRIM is really just a wrapper around btrim/rtrim/ltrim. > The question remains why it's a good idea to mess with a syntax behavior > that's been like that for a dozen years or more. I don't see any upside > to doing that. As an example of a downside, right now if you try to > pass extra arguments to TRIM() you'll get > > regression=# select trim(1,2,3); > ERROR: function pg_catalog.btrim(integer, integer, integer) does not exist > LINE 1: select trim(1,2,3); > ^ > HINT: No function matches the given name and argument types. You might need > to add explicit type casts. > > You might wonder why the message mentions "btrim" not "trim", but at least > the complaint is reasonably on-topic. After this patch, you'd just get > a "syntax error" message, which doesn't seem helpful at all. Well, btrim/rtrim/ltrim only take two arguments, so allowing three for it to fail later really doesn't seem to help much, compared to a syntax error. We did have someone confused by what we have now, as well as me, so I think there is a reason to clean this up. It would be a backward-compatible change, though. To document this, I think we would need to add only one line: trim([leading | trailing | both] [characters] from string) new trim([leading | trailing | both] [from] string [, characters]) Of course, that second line is non-standard --- do we have to mention that? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers