On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Since this behavior can also be demonstrated in 9.2 (and maybe further > back using xml features?), I don't think we should consider it a > blocker bug for 9.3. I'm planning to set it on the back burner for > the moment and go worry about the planner's LATERAL bugs.
+1 merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
