Agree, these are significant concerns. Just to make sure the scope of
the proposal is clear, I'm referring to col types created via CREATE
TYPE, i.e. locally-defined col types of much tighter granularity than
standard col types like INTEGER. Locally, one could adopt a naming
convention for these cols to identify that they have auto-generated
indices.
Best, Charles
On 13-08-19 8:42 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 08/19/2013 09:10 AM, Charles Sheridan wrote:
Hi,
I don't see indication that the capability described below exists in
Postgres (or any RDBMS), so this is likely a feature request --
For column types that are frequently defined in tables, and which are
typically indexed, it would be helpful to be able to specify in the type
definition of the column that its addition/creation into a table should
be automatically accompanied by the creation of an associated index.
Auto-index generation for a specific column type would be overridable
for specific tables, as you wouldn't always want to auto-create an index
at the time of column addition to a table. In the case of CREATE TABLE,
this would be less of a concern, and more of a concern for ALTER TABLE
ADD COLUMN.
Such a configuration would also specify the type of index.
What do you think ?
I think it's a bad idea. Indexes are not free and it would be a huge
and unwarranted assumption that they are wanted just because some
column type is used. If you want indexes it's up to you to create
them. The only exception is when they are created as an implementation
artifact for a table constraint, but even then you have to express the
constraint, it's not just assumed.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
