2013/8/20 David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:45:23PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > Hello > > > > Harder maybe but it may still be cleaner in the long run. > > > > > > Overall, it's my intention here to remove as many as feasible of the > old > > >> reasons why one might use an SRF in the select list. > > >> > > > > > > Indeed, it's a big nail in the coffin for SRFs-in-targetlist. Having > > > WITH ORDINALITY and this feature, I would vote for removing > > > SRF-in-targetlist and call the release PostgreSQL 10.0. > > > > > > > Although I would to remove SRF from targetlist, I don't think so this > hurry > > strategy is good idea. We should to provide new functionality and old > > functionality one year as minimum, and we should to announce so this > > feature is deprecated > > We could do this in 9.3, but all it would be is an announcement, i.e. > no code change of any nature. > > > - and maybe use a GUC for disabling, warning and deprecating. > > With utmost respect, I think the general idea of setting SQL grammar > via GUC is a really bad one. When we've done so in the past, it's > done more harm than good, and we should not repeat it. >
so as minumum is controlling warning via GUC, we should to help with identification of problematic queries. Regards Pavel > > > More, I would to see 9.4 release:). > > Same here! :) > > > x.4 are happy PostgreSQL releases :) > > Each one has been at least baseline happy for me since 7.1. Some have > made me overjoyed, though. > > Cheers, > David. > -- > David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ > Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter > Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com > iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics > > Remember to vote! > Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate >
