Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > But, for now, I think we should have a real index for the > statistics data because we already have several index storages, > and it will allow us to minimize read/write operations. > > BTW, what kind of index would be preferred for this purpose? > btree or hash?
I find it hard to get excited about using the AM interface for this purpose. To me it makes a lot more sense to have separate, much simpler code. We don't need any transactionality, user defined types, user defined operators, or anything like that. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
