Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> There's a large undercurrent of "I say it's bad for you" in >> this thread, with frankly nothing to back it up. If we try to >> be as nanny-ish as you're suggesting here, we'll just annoy >> users. > > +1.
+1 I can definitely see a place for an ASCII7 encoding which would reject anything with the high bit set; but there is a clear place for the current SQL_ASCII, too. Eliminating it would be much pain for no discernible gain. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
