On 2013-09-06 23:07:04 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:00:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 05:06:41PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> Another possible fix would be to avoid the IS NULL value optimizer > > >> expansion if a ROW construct is inside a ROW(). I have attached a patch > > >> that does this for review. > > > > > Having received no replies, do people perfer this version of the patch > > > that just punts nested ROW IS NULL testing to execQual.c? > > > > For some reason I read your previous message as saying you were willing to > > wait for considered reviews this time. If not, I'll just write a blanket > > -1 for any version of this patch. > > Are you saying people will comment later? I wasn't clear that was the > plan. I can certainly wait.
You do realize mere mortals in the project frequently have to wait *months* to get comments on their patches? Not getting any for less than 48h doesn't seem to be saying much. Why don't you add the proposal to the commitfest? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
