Noah Misch-2 wrote > The errfinish() pertaining to that WARNING issues CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), > and > the query cancel pending since before the SIGQUIT arrived then takes > effect. > This is less bad on 9.4, because the postmaster will SIGKILL the backend > after > 5s. On older releases, the backend persists indefinitely.
9.4 == head or is this is typo? Your feelings on how far to back-patch? David J. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Pending-query-cancel-defeats-SIGQUIT-tp5770390p5770394.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
