> On 15 September 2013 at 18:42 Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > > > On 09/14/2013 10:27 PM, chris travers wrote: > > Well, you could fairly easily build it as an extension as a POC. The > main point of the API this is built on was to allow for extensions. > > The logic changes might be a bit tricky. I'll be interested to see what > you come up with. > > If we're going to do this we should make these handle arrays as well as > objects.
Yes, arrays are necessary for my use case. I probably should have been explicit that I needed that too. Best Wishes, Chris Travers > > cheers > > andrew > > Best Wishes, Chris Travers http://www.2ndquadrant.com PostgreSQL Services, Training, and Support
