On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 08:59:42AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:12:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > If we had not made massive cleanup changes years ago, our code would not > > be as good as it is today. By avoiding cleanup to reduce the burden on > > people who use our code, we are positioning our code on a slow decline > > in clarity. > > > > What I don't want to do is get into a mode where every code cleanup has > > to be verified that it isn't going to excessively burden outside code > > users. Cleanup is hard enough, and adding another check to that process > > makes cleanup even less likely. > > I don't disagree with that, but I would describe the proposal as a mild > dirty-up for the sake of build performance, not a cleanup.
OK, good enough. Thanks for the feedback. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
