On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> >> On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>> Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to that >> >>> version. Any objections? >> > >> >> This was not done for 9.3rc1, AFAICT. Let's please do it for the next >> >> release builds. >> > >> > Um ... touching borka's toolchain post-rc1 sure sounds like a recipe >> > for making ourselves look like idiots in a high-profile release. >> > Wouldn't it be better to wait till after 9.3.0? >> >> I agree that doing it after the RC is a bad idea. We should probably >> try to do it more or less directly after the release though, so we >> (I..) don't forget it again... > > Did we get around to doing this?
Nope. Given my schedule between now and the release wrap, I won't have a chance to do it if I want any reasonable ability to roll it back if it fails. But if you want to ahead and get it done, go ahead :) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
