On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:54:14AM +0530, Rushabh Lathia wrote: > Thanks Bruce. > > Yes for me main problem was to make assumption that a 5-digit number is a > year, > as was bit worried about side effect of that assumption in the date/time > module. I > did tested patch shared by you with various test and so far it looks good to > me. > > I would like reviewer to review/test the patch and share his comments. > > Attaching the git patch again with this mail. > > Assigning to Reviewer.
Oh, great. If everyone likes it I can apply it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
