On 2013-10-08 15:02:39 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
> On 10/07/2013 09:32 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >Todo:
> >* rename treat_as_catalog_table, after agreeing on the new name
> >* rename remaining timetravel function names
> >* restrict SuspendDecodingSnapshots usage to RelationInitPhysicalAddr,
> >   that ought to be enough.
> >* add InLogicalDecoding() function.
> >* throw away older data when reading xl_running_xacts records, to deal
> >   with immediate shutdowns/crashes
> 
> What is your current plan for decoding sequence updates?  Is this something
> that you were going to hold-off on supporting till a future version? ( know
> this was discussed a while ago but I don't remember where it stands now)

I don't plan to implement it as part of this - the optimizations in
sequences make it really unsuitable for that (nontransaction, allocated
in bulk, ...).
Simon had previously posted about "sequence AMs", and I have a prototype
patch that implements that concept (which needs considerable cleanup). I
plan to post about it whenever this is finished.

I think many replication solutions that care about sequences in a
nontrivial will want to implement their own sequence logic anyway, so I
think that's not a bad path.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to