On 2013-10-09 10:30:46 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Josh Berkus suggested here that work_mem and maintenance_work_mem could > be auto-tuned like effective_cache_size: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/50eccf93.3060...@agliodbs.com > > The attached patch implements this, closely matching the default values > for the default shared_buffers value:
There imo is no correlation between correct values for shared_buffers and work_mem at all. They really are much more workload dependant than anything. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
