Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Sounds good. I think the earliest we could be ready for beta2 is the > > end of this week; sometime next week may be more realistic. > > > > Given that we'll be forcing an initdb for beta2 anyway, those who use > > RPMs may be just as happy to have missed beta1. > > If an initdb is planned - did that split->split_part or whatever change make > it in?
Yes, it did, and in fact if you didn't initdb after the patch was applied, you would see regression failures. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
