On 2013-10-18 13:16:52 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 10/18/2013 12:29 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2013-10-18 09:32:15 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> For that matter, 9.4 is a very good time (relatively speaking) to break > >> replication tools because the new logical replication is going to cause > >> everyone to rev their tools anyway. > > > > We're hopefully getting changeset extraction in, but there's little > > chance of a full blown replication solution making it in in 9.4... > > I thought changeset extraction was the only thing going into core? What > else do we need?
Well, I personally want more in core mid/long term, but anyway. Without released, proven and stable logical in-core replication technology using this, I don't see why repmgr or something related would need/want to change? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
