On 2013-10-18 13:16:52 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 12:29 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2013-10-18 09:32:15 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> For that matter, 9.4 is a very good time (relatively speaking) to break
> >> replication tools because the new logical replication is going to cause
> >> everyone to rev their tools anyway.
> > 
> > We're hopefully getting changeset extraction in, but there's little
> > chance of a full blown replication solution making it in in 9.4...
> 
> I thought changeset extraction was the only thing going into core?  What
> else do we need?

Well, I personally want more in core mid/long term, but anyway.

Without released, proven and stable logical in-core replication
technology using this, I don't see why repmgr or something related would
need/want to change?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to