On 10/24/2013 04:15 AM, Pavan Deolasee wrote: > If we do what you are suggesting, it seems like a single line patch to me. > In XLogSaveBufferForHint(), we probably need to look at this additional GUC > to decide whether or not to backup the block.
Wait, what? Why are we having an additional GUC? I'm opposed to the idea of having a GUC to enable failback. When would anyone using replication ever want to disable that? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
