On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:08:05PM -0700, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Sergey Konoplev <gray...@gmail.com> writes:
> >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> This is a slightly reworked version of the patch submitted by Richard
> >>> Poole last month, which was based on Christian Kruse's earlier patch.
> >> Is it possible that this patch will be included in a minor version of
> >> 9.3? IMHO hugepages is a very important ability that postgres lost in
> >> 9.3, and it would be great to have it back ASAP.
> > Say what? There's never been any hugepages support in Postgres.
> There were an ability to back shared memory with hugepages when using
> <=9.2. I use it on ~30 servers for several years and it brings 8-17%
> of performance depending on the memory size. Here you will find
> several paragraphs of the description about how to do it
> Just search for the 'hugepages' word on the page.
For better or worse, we add new features exactly and only in .0
releases. It's what's made it possible for people to plan
deployments, given us a deserved reputation for stability, etc., etc.
I guess what I'm saying here is that awesome as any particular feature
might be to back-patch, that benefit is overwhelmed by the cost of
having unstable releases.
-infininty from me to any proposal that gets us into "are you using
PostgreSQL x.y.z or x.y.w?" when it comes to features.
David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: