Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > -1. If someone asks for a hash index, they should get a hash index. > If you feel the documentation isn't sufficiently clear about the problems > involved, we can work on that.
Fair enough. > Lastly: what real-world problem are we solving by kicking that code > to the curb? Well how long did we wait for the fix already? The lack of crash safety and replication ability is not just a drawback, it's about killing the user adoption. Maybe we should implement UNLOGGED indexes and then Hash Indexes would only exist in the UNLOGGED fashion? But well, yeah ok, my idea is a non-starter. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
