* Dimitri Fontaine (dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr) wrote:
> So please find v15 of the patch attached to this email, that passes all
> previously done checks and this one too now.

Looks like there's been a bit of unfortunate bitrot due to Tom's change
to disable fancy output:

patching file src/test/regress/expected/sanity_check.out
Hunk #1 FAILED at 104.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 166.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file 

Are there any other changes you have pending for this..?  Would be nice
to see the latest version which you've tested and which patches cleanly
against master... ;)

I'll still go ahead and start looking through this, per our discussion.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to