On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Haribabu kommi > <haribabu.ko...@huawei.com> wrote: >> On 01 October 2013 00:56 Amit Kapila wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> >>> wrote: >>> > On 9/28/13 3:05 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: >>> >> Now as we have an agreement, I had updated patch for below left >>> issues: >>> > >> >> Some of the initial observation of the patch are, >> 1. Patch is not applying against git head, needs a rebase.
Find the rebased version attached with this mail. I have removed header inclusions of port.h and lwlock.h from guc.c, it works fine without them. >> 2. Patch doesn't contain the tests. > It was intentional and as per feedback for this patch. As for > testing this feature, we need to put sleep after operation, so it was > suggested to remove tests. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers