On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> +1. If changing at all, then maybe just "autovacuum_mem"?

I would like to stick with autovacuum_work_mem - it reflects the fact
that it's a setting shadowed by maintenance_work_mem, without being
too verbose.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to