I'll try to have a look-see by the end of the weekend.  Any code that
can reproduce it or is it ANY code that uses SPI?


On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 11:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
> > On looking a little more closely, it's clear that pltcl_SPI_exec()
> > should be, and is not, calling SPI_freetuptable() once it's done with
> > the tuple table returned by SPI_exec().  This needs to be done in all
> > the non-elog code paths after SPI_exec has returned SPI_OK_SELECT.
> There's a note in the PL/Python documentation that it's leaking memory if
> SPI plans are used.  Maybe that's related and someone could take a look at
> it.
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to