On 2013-11-19 13:14:34 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:12:32PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > But even if that weren't a concern, the fact that BEGIN does it one way
> > currently doesn't seem very indicative of changing other historical 
> > behaviour.
> Look at this gem, which returns notice:
>       test=> ABORT;
>       NOTICE:  there is no transaction in progress
>       ROLLBACK
>       test=>
> We are all over the map on this!  The big question is whether we want to
> add some sanity to this, or just leave it alone, and if we leave it
> alone, what pattern do we use for the new checks?

I think changing a NOTICE into a WARNING or the reverse is fine,
changing a WARNING/NOTICE into an ERROR or the reverse is something
which should be done only very hesitantly.


Andres Freund

 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to