On 11/19/2013 10:12 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:01 PM, FabrÃzio de Royes Mello >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/app-pg-isready.html >> >> Attached is the updated version of the patch. Is there any other bug? > > Not that I can see, but it's not very future-proof. If libpq changes > its idea of what will provoke database-name expansion, this will again > be broken.
Why aren't we using the exact same code as psql? Why does pg_isready have its own code for this? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
