On 11/19/2013 10:29 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > It's pretty unlikely that any automated testing would have cought this, > the required conditions are too unlikely for that.
Given our almost total lack of automated testing for replication, how would you (or anyone else) possibly know that? We certainly do know that we won't catch these kinds of bugs *without* testing. Heck, even MySQL AB had automated testing for replication. They largely ignored the results, but they had it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
