Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Tom> and this would result in producing the array elements as a table
> Tom> column. There is nothing in there about a function returning
> Tom> set.
> In the spec, there is no such thing as a function returning a set of
> rows in the sense that we use.
Right, but they do have a concept of arrays that's similar to ours,
and AFAICS the spec demands different behavior for an array-returning
function than what we've got here.
We could conceivably say that we'll implicitly UNNEST() if the function
returns array, and not otherwise --- but that seems pretty inconsistent
and surprise-making to me. I'm not too sure what to do if a function
returns setof array, either.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
