J Smith escribió:

> We did have some long-running transactions, yes. We refactored a bit
> and removed them and the problem ceased on our end. We ended up
> reverting our changes for the sake of running this experiment over the
> weekend and the errors returned. We've since restored our fix and
> haven't had any problems since, so yeah, long-running transactions
> appear to be involved.
> We can continue to experiment if you have any additional tests you'd
> like us to run. We may have to keep the experiments to running over
> the weekend, but they're definitely do-able.

I am working on patches to get these bugs fixed.  Would you be up for
running a patched binary and see if the errors go away?

Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to