Tom Lane wrote:
> Mike Mascari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bruce wrote:
> > "Yes, someone from India has a project to test LRU-K and MRU for
> > large table scans and report back the results. He will
> > implement whichever is best."
> > Did this make it into 7.3?
> No, we never heard back from that guy. It is still a live topic though.
> One of the Red Hat people was looking at it over the summer, and I think
> Neil Conway is experimenting with LRU-2 code right now.
> > 2. Gavin Sherry had worked up a patch so that temporary
> > relations could be dropped automatically upon transaction
> > commit. Did any of those patches it make it?
> No they didn't; I forget whether there was any objection to his last try
> or it was just too late to get reviewed before feature freeze.
I see it going into the patch queue. Here is the full thread:
I don't see why it wasn't applied.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?