Tom Lane wrote:
> Mike Mascari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bruce wrote:
> > "Yes, someone from India has a project to test LRU-K and MRU for 
> > large table scans and report back the results.  He will 
> > implement whichever is best."
> > Did this make it into 7.3?
> No, we never heard back from that guy.  It is still a live topic though.
> One of the Red Hat people was looking at it over the summer, and I think
> Neil Conway is experimenting with LRU-2 code right now.
> > 2. Gavin Sherry had worked up a patch so that temporary 
> > relations could be dropped automatically upon transaction 
> > commit. Did any of those patches it make it?
> No they didn't; I forget whether there was any objection to his last try
> or it was just too late to get reviewed before feature freeze.

I see it going into the patch queue.  Here is the full thread:

I don't see why it wasn't applied.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

Reply via email to