I'll prepare patch

2013/11/27 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>

> Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Actually the IF EXISTS in DROP TABLE now applies to the schema as
> > well. Unfortunately there is currently no consistency across the
> > various DROP commands --- some tolerate a non-existent schema, while
> > others error out.
> Yeah.  I think now that we've had this discussion, we should make them
> all tolerate a non-existent schema.  I'm fine with having that happen
> over a series of patches rather than all at once though.
> > Also amongst those that tolerate a non-existent
> > schema, the resulting notices are not consistent --- some report the
> > schema-qualified object name, while others just report the local
> > object name.
> Less excited about this part, but on the whole I'd vote for the "schema
> "no_such_schema" does not exist" wording in cases where the schema isn't
> there.  The other way is less specific for no very good reason.
>                         regards, tom lane

Reply via email to