I'll prepare patch
2013/11/27 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> > Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: > > Actually the IF EXISTS in DROP TABLE now applies to the schema as > > well. Unfortunately there is currently no consistency across the > > various DROP commands --- some tolerate a non-existent schema, while > > others error out. > > Yeah. I think now that we've had this discussion, we should make them > all tolerate a non-existent schema. I'm fine with having that happen > over a series of patches rather than all at once though. > > > Also amongst those that tolerate a non-existent > > schema, the resulting notices are not consistent --- some report the > > schema-qualified object name, while others just report the local > > object name. > > Less excited about this part, but on the whole I'd vote for the "schema > "no_such_schema" does not exist" wording in cases where the schema isn't > there. The other way is less specific for no very good reason. > > regards, tom lane >