On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 15:56 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > How about this?
>
> Hmm. You say:
>
> + If the command returns a nonzero exit status then a warning log
> + message will be written. An exception is that if the command was
> + terminated by a signal or an error by the shell (such as command not
> + found), a fatal error will be raised.
>
> But in the case of the archiver, in contrast to the startup process,
> this isn't really a big deal. It'll just pick up where it left off.
> Whereas the reaper code shuts down the system if this happens in the
> startup process. In my opinion that's a distinction that bears
> emphasizing.
That snippet you quote is about archive_cleanup_command. My patch
doesn't touch archive_command at all.
The current documentation about archive_command contains
<para>
It is important that the archive command return zero exit status if and
only if it succeeds. Upon getting a zero result,
<productname>PostgreSQL</> will assume that the file has been
successfully archived, and will remove or recycle it. However, a nonzero
status tells <productname>PostgreSQL</> that the file was not archived;
it will try again periodically until it succeeds.
</para>
which I think addresses your point.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
