On 5 December 2013 10:06, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think #1175 is close to being ready for commit. Pavel, will you
>> produce an updated patch based on our last discussion? I'll set this
>> patch to waiting on author.
> I expected so your version was a final. I have no problem to do other
> enhancing (by me) , but I don't fully understand to your last proposal. Can
> you specify it more, please?

Well I was basically proposing that does_not_exist_skipping() be
enhanced to report on non-existent types that form part of the object
specification. I think this would affect the CAST, FUNCTION, AGGREGATE
and OPERATOR cases, but should be a fairly trivial extension to the
code that you've already added.

It should be possible to make the notice text from DROP...IF EXISTS
consistent with the error text from a plain DROP. For example consider
cases like func_name(no_such_schema.typename) and


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to