> On 2013/12/08, at 10:50, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
>> On 12/07/2013 05:41 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Michael Paquier 
>> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com <mailto:michael.paqu...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>>> IMHO is more elegant create a procedure to encapsulate the code
>>>> to avoid redundancy.
>>> Yep, perhaps something like PQsetClientEncodingIfDifferent or
>>> similar would make sense.
>> Well I think at this first moment we can just create a procedure
>> inside the dblink contrib and not touch in libpq.
> Maybe a libpq function could be done for 9.4, but not for back branches.
Agreed as this would change the spec of libpq between minor releases. Sorry for 
not being clear myself.

>  -- we're only talking about two lines of added redundancy which is
> less lines of code than a new function would add. But if we create
> PQsetClientEncodingIfDifferent() (or whatever) we can remove those
> extra lines in 9.4 ;-)

(Sent from my mobile phone)

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to