On 12/10/2013 11:49 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I don't think that anyone believes that not doing block sampling is > tenable, fwiw. Clearly some type of block sampling would be preferable > for most or all purposes.
As discussed, we need math though. Does anyone have an ACM subscription and time to do a search? Someone must. We can buy one with community funds, but no reason to do so if we don't have to. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
