Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Here is an updated patch that implements this, makes some of the >> documentation improvements that you suggested, and rebases everything.
> I'm still kinda unimpressed by this. Behavior-changing GUC, uggh. We should have learned by now that those are usually a bad idea. In this case, we've got changes in the behavior of function calling, which seems like not only a nightmare for debugging but a fertile source of security issues. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers